RAJJAN LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A482/8962/2025 · 2025-11-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183587 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183587 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8962 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Smt. Neelu Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance for the private opposite party No. 4 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):-
"1. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned Chargesheet dated 10.02.2018 registered against the petitioners' case crime no. 1170/2017, Under section-352, 354, 450, 376, 504, 506 I.P.C. ¼ PCSO Act., Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow, along with criminal proceedings, contained in ANNEXURES attached to the writ petition including the criminal proceeding initiated in pursuance there of as petitioner is concerned. 2. Issue a petition order or direction in the nature of CHARGESHEET Quashing commanding the opposite parties, not to cause any harassment to the petitioner of the basis of impugned F.I.R. Because the order of taking cognizance against the present applicant and chargesheet is deserves to be set aside the applicant and victim had married each other and living other peacefully."
4. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anita Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajjan Lal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the concerned court within four week's from today.
(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. November 3, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 8962 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench