HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6416 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State respondent no.1 and Shri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.17. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents no. 2 to 16, is dispensed with. 2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "Issue an order or direction to the opposite party no.1 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) Sadar, District Sitapur to dispose of the stay application dated 06.10.2025 Computer Case No. T202510640204786 (Sughar Vs. Smt. Sharma Devi & others) filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in regard of the Gata No. 453, 559 situated at Village & Post Ramkot Pargana Ramkot District Sitapur, which is initiated by the petitioner, within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and the above noted proceeding pending from 03.04.2025 before the court below, within the period stipulated by this Honb'le Court, in the interest of justice. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner filed the case under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the opposite party no.1 on the basis of Bhumidhari land, which was registered by the court below on 3.4.2025 but no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served. 4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Sughar .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate Judicial, Sadar, Sitapur And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within next six weeks. 6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. . November 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6416 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench