MUSHTAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/11298/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11298 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0393 of 2025, under Section 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Bhadokhar, District Raebareli.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused has been granted bail.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the nature of the allegations, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Mushtak be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mushtak .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 11298 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench