VINAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY.HIGHER EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.andORS.
WRIA/20517/2017 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 20517 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 26, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Shameem Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Savitra Vardhan Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Higher Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench