- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7148 WP No. 5950 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 5950 OF 2021 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR. S.N.SHAMBHULINGA S/O M.NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, CHANNAKESHAVANILAYA, SHANTHAMMA LAYOUT, SIDDESHWARANAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. 2. SMT. SEEMA.S W/O S.N.SHAMBULINGA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, CHANNAKESHAVANILAYA, SHANTHAMMA LAYOUT, SIDDESHWARANAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.V.SATEESHCHANDRA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: CANARA BANK, KASHIPURA BRANCH, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED BANK MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NATASHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7148 WP No. 5950 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of February 2025. It's been four years. So far, scrutiny stage office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13