HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11610 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. In the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 11.9.2024, at about 3 P.M, two persons cane to purchase rice from the shop of the complainant, when the complainant went for weighing rice, the accused persons stole Rs. 28,500 from his drawer. The F.I.R has been registered on the basis of the CCTV footage. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant has criminal history of five cases which has been explained in paragraph-17,18,19 of the bail application and para 2 of the supplementary Affidavit, filed today, which is taken on record. The applicant is languishing in jail since 14.09.2025. He further submits that the offences are triable by the Magistrate and the said offence is punishable upto a maximum period of seven years. There is no independent witness of the said incident. He further submits that co- accused Asharf has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.11.2025 passed in Bail Application No.10814 of 2025. He seeks parity with the bail order of the said co-accused. 4. It is further submitted that charge-sheet in the case has been filed. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Firoz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akleem @ Pappu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. Considering the bail order of the co-accused Asharf and the facts that charge-sheet has been filed; the period for which the applicant is in jail i.e. since 14.09.2025; the fact that the applicant has explained criminal history of five cases in paragraph-17,18 and 19 of the bail application and in paragraph 2 of the Supplementary affidavit, as also the fact that there is no independent witness to the said incident and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Akleem alias Pappu involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 267 of 2025 Under Sections- 305(a), 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Baskhari, District- Ambedkar Nagar, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. 9. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. 10. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. November 26, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S BAIL No. 11610 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench