VIVEK SIDDHARTH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10331/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10331 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Ankur Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Arun Sinha, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.174 of 2025 under Sections 108 BNS, P.S.- Chowk, District- Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Smt. Mudita Rastogi @ Kukki has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 31.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9288 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 31.10.2025, ground of parity, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 02.07.2025 having no criminal history. I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Vivek Siddharth be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Sinha, Ram Chandra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vivek Siddharth .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 10331 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench