Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183505 (ALL)

SHASHI KANT SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1662/2025 · 2025-11-18

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1662 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Ram Lakhan, learned counsel for the informant and perused the records. 2. Present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.308 of 2025, under Section 191(2), 74, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 127(4), 70(1), 3(5), 296 BNS, Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide separate orders which have also been confirmed by the subsequently orders. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and learned AGA oppose the bail application. 5. Considering the improbability of the allegations of FIR coupled with the fact that the co-accused were granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail which has become final, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Shashi Kant Shukla be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of trial on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shashi Kant Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 18, 2025 nishant NABAIL No. 1662 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench