IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1010 of 2025 Decided on: 03.03.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Satnam Singh ....Petitioner Versus Yunus …Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record a copy of office order dated 02.03.2026 from the Commissioner Industries, Himachal Pradesh, deciding the case of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has some reservation to the consideration order so passed by the respondent and he, therefore, seeks liberty to assail the same. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - 3. Taking note of the office order, present contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, including against the consideration order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge March 3, 2026 R.Atal