Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183473 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR @ VINOD KUMAR SAROJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/11461/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11461 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0079 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS, and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Kunda, District Pratapgarh. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 13 years was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statement under section 183, the victim did not support the prosecution and stated that both of them had married and physical relation were formed with consent. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim. The tentative medical age of the victim is between sixteen to 18 years. 4. Considering the statement, the applicant who is in custody since 04.06.2025 is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Saroj be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umesh Kumar Yadav, Rajneesh Dev Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Saroj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11461 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench