RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/13976/2025 · 2025-12-03
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13976 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to count services rendered by petitioner from the date of his initial appointment on 01.01.1989 taking the said services as qualifying service for computation of pension.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Kamaluddin vs. State of U.P. and another, Writ-A No. 17042 of 2021.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of aforesaid judgment in case same is applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 3, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Sharvan Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench