Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4328 MFA No. 6694 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6694 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. T. PAVITHRA D/O SRI. P. THAYANNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.143, OLD P.O.ROAD DODDABANASAVADI, BENGALURU-560 043. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. V.B. SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE - [ABSENT]) AND:
SMT VINUTHA P.M W/O GANESH K AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT NO.329, 3RD CROSS KODIHALLI, BENGALURU-560 008 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K. SHRIDHARA, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23.04.2018 PASSED ON I.A. NO.1 IN O.S.NO.1834/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY(CCH-30), DISMISSING I.A. NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4328 MFA No. 6694 of 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the appellant was dead long back.
3. Though plaintiff is dead long back, learned counsel for the plaintiff has not filed any application to bring the legal representatives on record.
4. This Court granted sufficient opportunity and adjournments on many occasions. The matter is pending from 2018 challenging the impugned order passed by the Trial Court.
5. In the absence of learned counsel for the appellant, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE DS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18