Sima Kumari @ Seema Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/12296/2018 · 2025-07-03
Smt G Anupama Chakravarthy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18345 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18345 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12296 of 2018 ====================================================== Sima Kumari @ Seema Kumari W/o Anil Kumar Resident of Village- Tilaiya, P.O. Rajauli, P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supply Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supply Department, Govt. of Bihar.
3. The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.
4. The District Magistrate-Cum-Chairman, District Selection Committee, Nawada.
5. The District Supply Officer-Cum-Secretary, District Selection Committee, Nawada.
6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajauli, Nawada.
7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nawada.
8. The Supply Officer, Rajauli, Nawada.
9. Yoshoda Kumari W/o Dilip Das Resident of Village- Tilaiya, P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.S.Raza Ahmad - Aag-5 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 03-07-2025
1. Heard the Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Learned counsel for the respondents.
2. During the course of argument, the
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the concerned authorities.
3. Considering that the Writ petition is filed
Patna High Court CWJC No.12296 of 2018(2) dt.03-07-2025 2/2 in the year 2018 itself and an alternative remedy is available to the petitioner, liberty is granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the concerned authority within one month from the date of receipt of this order.
4. In response the appellate authority shall liberally construe the limitation aspect as the Writ petition is filed in the year 2018. Further the appellate authority shall dispose of the appeal within three months from the date of its filing.
5. With the above said observation, without going into the merits of the case, the Writ petition is disposed of.
amitkr/- (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) U