SAPNA SAXENA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/6950/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183448 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183448 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6950 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.9886 of 2012 arising out of Case Crime No.0308 of 2011, under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Hazratganj, District Lucknow. 3. It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature. This court vide order dated 16.9.2025 had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court where settlement agreement had arrived on 27.11.2025 between the parties, it is on record. The parties have amicably settled their dispute and further agreed to withdraw the cases going on between them. The said fact has been mentioned in para 6 of the settlement agreement dated 27.11.2025. 4. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, Wasim Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arun Sinha, Pranshu Agrawal, Siddhartha Sinha Sapna Saxena And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the mediation, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 6.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the settlement agreement arrived at between the parties on 27.11.2025 before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, the present application is allowed and the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.9886 of 2012 arising out of Case Crime No.0308 of 2011, under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Hazratganj, District Lucknow is hereby quashed. December 15, 2025 GauraV/- A482 No. 6950 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench