HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6714 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 to 3 and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondents no. 4 and 5. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.3 to decide the case no. C202402000001634 of 2024, under Section 333 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, (Chamela Devi Vs. Land Management Committee), filed by the petitioner on merit within a stipulated period as fixed by this Honb'le Court, in the interest of justice. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 3 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.3 is directed to make all endeavor to decide decide the case no. C202402000001634 of 2024, under Section 333 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, (Chamela Devi Vs. Land Management Committee), filed by the petitioner, expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Chamela Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 17, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6714 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench