Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183422 (ALL)

JAI MANGAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PWD U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13072/2025 · 2025-11-12

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13072 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's application for compassionate appointment since his father late Siyaram is said to have passed away in harness on 08.07.2025. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, (Praantiye Khand), Public Works Department, Ayodhya. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 12, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kishor Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Jai Mangal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Pwd U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench