Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183416 (ALL)

HAREESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/14329/2025 · 2025-12-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14329 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay to the Petitioner the arrears of leave salary admissible during the training period of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police) along with allowances in addition to stipend, strictly in terms of Government Order dated 16.09.1965, Circular dated 03.11.1979 and the law down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Special Appeal No. 169 of 2020 (Alok Kumar Singh & Others vs. State of U.P. & Others) as affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court." 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same, in light of aforesaid judgment, in case same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 15, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajit Singh, Apporv Pal, Vindhyapal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Hareesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench