2025:JHHC:11907 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.4331 of 2024 ------ 1.Bhuneshwar Mahato @ Bhuneshwar Dangi, aged about 60 years, son of late Dillo Mahato 2.Devki Dangi @ Devki Ram Dangi, aged about 30 years, son of Bhuneshwar Ram Dangi 3.Ganesh Dangi, aged about 25 years, son of Bhuneshwar Dangi, all are residence of village Barbadih, PO and PS Pathalgadda, District Chatra … … Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Asha Devi, aged about 45 years, wife of Taken Dangi, resident of village Singhani, PO and PS Pathalgada, District Chatra and Maukam village Hudmud, Tola Sichatti, PO and PS Simaria, District Chatra … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aparna Sharma, Advocate. Ms. Anshu Kumari, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Sushant Kumar Sinha, Advocate ----- 08/ 22.04.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 447, 427, 341, 323, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Complaint Case No. 1014 of 2019 pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chatra. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. This case arises out of a complaint where cognizance has already been taken so there is no apprehension of arrest. 5. Since this is complaint there is no question of any custodial interrogation or any investigation. The petitioners are directed to appear before the Court concerned. 6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3