Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18341 (CHH)

NARENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1337/2025 · 2025-04-21

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17909 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1337 of 2025 Narendra Singh S/o Rambilas Prajapati Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Bonali, Gufteshwar Road, Indira Colony, Thana Mantown Savai Madhopur, District Savai Madhopur (Rajasthan) ... Petitioners versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Narcotics Control Bureau Unit, Indore Madhya Pradesh By Goverment ... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 21.04.2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. This is an ofÏce reference. 3. This Court, vide order dated 07.11.2024, passed in MCRC No. 7446 of 2024, while rejecting the bail to the petitioner, namely, Narendra Singh, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 4. Earlier on occasion also, this Court had granted extension of time for conclusion of the trial vide order dated 21.02.2025 in CRMP No.651/2025. 5. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Janjgir, District – Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, District – Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 02.04.2025 has requested for grant of three month’s time for concluding the trial. 6. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that the trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, and the prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. Therefore, trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of three month’s time for concluding the trial. 7. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 8. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 9. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar