RAMESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/7316/2025 · 2025-12-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183400 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183400 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7316 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State-respondent to decide Appeal No. 98/2025 (Ramesh Kumar & others Vs. Tribhuwan & others) filed U/S 11(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 and application dated 04.08.2024 for Stay of effect and implementation of order dated 28.07.2021, expeditiously.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer and submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid appeal in the time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Settlement Officer Consolidation, District - Amethi is directed to decide Appeal No. 98/2025 (Ramesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ramesh Kumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
Kumar & others Vs. Tribhuwan & others) filed U/S 11(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 18, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7316 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench