Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1834 (UTT)

RASHID SHAH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/186/2025 · 2025-02-13

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.186 of 2025 Rashid Shah …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.28 of 2025, dated 16.01.2025, under Sections 8/20/29/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“the Act”), Police Station Nehru Colony, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 16.01.2025, 405 Grams Charas was allegedly recovered from the possession of the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case; the allegedly recovered quantity is less than 2 commercial; it is a case of non-compliance of the provisions of the Act and the applicant is not a previous convict. 5. Learned State counsel would submit that the bail rejection order does not reveal that the applicant is a previous convict. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount; to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 13.02.2025 Sanjay