OM PRAKASH v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SADAR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/6694/2025 · 2025-11-17
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6694 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos. 1 and 2.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 to decide Case No. 66/202554042345011425 (Ajay Prakash and others Vs. Om Prakash and others) filed under Rule 109 of the Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, relating to Villafge Ankaripur, Pargana Amasin, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya, pending before him since 16.11.2024, within a stipulated time period.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 is directed to make all endeavor to decide Case No. 66/202554042345011425 (Ajay Prakash and others Vs. Om Prakash and others) filed under Rule 109 of the Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, relating to Villafge Ankaripur, Pargana Amasin, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya, expeditiously, say within a period of one Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Om Prakash .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 17, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6694 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench