Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183362 (ALL)

PURUSHOTTAM HARIRAM MAURYA @ NEERAJ MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/10604/2025 · 2025-10-31

Shekhar B Saraf, Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10604 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Aditya Mohan, Advocate on behalf of opposite parties no.2, 3 and 6 is taken on record. 2. Upon perusal of the writ petition, it is clear that the enquiry is being conducted by a Committee formed by Executive Engineer, Gonda, U.P. Jal Nigam (Rulal) being the respondent no.6 herein. 3. The enquiry is ongoing. In the light of the same we are of the view that the writ petition is premature and the same is accordingly dismissed. 4. We make it clear that after the enquiry is completed, if the petitioner has any grievance against the same, he shall be at liberty to seek his legal remedies in accordance with law. October 31, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Verma, Arvind Kumar Maurya, Kanchan, Pawan Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Kapoor (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Purushottam Hariram Maurya @ Neeraj Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench