VIJAY KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND ANOTHER
/1008/2025 · 2025-11-27
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1008 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.26, Lucknow to decide Criminal Misc. Case No.1540 of 2018, State Vs. Vijay Kumar Yadav, under Section 3/9 of Examination Act, 1982, Police Station Mahanagar, District Lucknow within a time frame.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though notices have been issued to the complainant, but he has not tuned up for recording his statement. He further submits that case is pending since 2018 and there is no substantial progress in it. He, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously in accordance with law.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously in accordance with law without giving any unnecessary adjournments.
5. Application stands disposed of. November 27, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Asheesh Kumar Tiwari, Ankit Singh, Brijendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Vijay Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench