- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1226 WP No. 5902 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.5902 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. P.S. ADINARAYANA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O LATE SRI P. SATYANARAYANA PROPRIETOR M/S. P. SATYANARAYANA AND CO. HPCL DEALER, NO.136, S.C. ROAD SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE-560 020. …PETITIONER [BY SRI SUBHASH SRINIVASA RANGACHAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. NO.17, JAMSHEDJI TATA ROAD MUMBAI-400 020 REGIONAL OFFICE AT NO.77 OLD MADRAS ROAD DOORAVANINAGAR POST KRISHNARAJAPURAM BANGALORE-560 016 REP. BY ITS THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER- Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1226 WP No. 5902 of 2021 RETAIL AND DULY CONSTITUTED AUTHORITY. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER-RETAIL M/S HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. NO.77, OLD MADRAS ROAD DOORAVANINAGAR POST KRISHNARAJAPURAM BENGALURU-560 016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JIDESH KUMAR M.D., ADVOCATE) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.03.2021 PASSED ON I.A.NO.III IN C.A.A.48/2019 ON THE FILE OF LXXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ALLOW THE AMENDMENT APPLICATION I.A.NO.III VIDE ANNEXURE-D, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1226 WP No. 5902 of 2021 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. The petitioner in the instant writ petition has challenged the order dated 05.03.2021 passed on I.A.No.III in COM.A.A.No.48/2019 by the LXXXIII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru vide Annexure-'F' to the writ petition. The said application is filed under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to amend the application filed for interim prayers before the City Civil Court in an arbitration proceedings. The said application has been dismissed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by which, the present writ petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the arbitration proceedings itself have been concluded between the parties concerned and an award has been passed. 4. A copy of the award proceedings is produced before this Court. The same is taken on record. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:1226 WP No. 5902 of 2021 5. In the light of the same, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19