BECHE LAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/13891/2025 · 2025-12-02
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183341 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183341 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13891 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):-
"(I) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties to pay to the petitioner the salary in the pay band of 5200-20200, grade pay 2400 w.e.f. 16.02.2013 along with arrears thereof, as has been granted in the case of Bhawani Prasad Sahu Vs. State of U.P. (Writ Petition No. 1670/2014 (S/S)) and Saiyed Kazim Imam Vs. State of U.P. (Writ A No.
186/2010 (S/S))."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Executive Engineer, Electrical Maintenance Division No.1, Public Works Department, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same, in light of aforesaid judgments in case same are applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 2, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayankar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Beche Lal Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench