HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7148 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.13 has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gonda to decide demarcation case No.10210/2022, computerized case No.T 202208300610210 "Madan Kesarwani VS. Kashiram" under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gonda is directed to decide demarcation case No.10210/2022, computerized case No.T 202208300610210 "Madan Kesarwani VS. Kashiram" under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 11, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimlesh Kumar, Rita Yadav, Ved Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Madan Kesarwani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench