Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18332 (KAR)

SRI. SIDDARAJU v. SMT. SHILPA N

WP/6655/2025 · 2025-04-03

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13976 WP No. 6655 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6655 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. SIDDARAJU S/O MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O NO.23, SRINIVASA POOJARI, NARAYANAPPA LAYOUT, 2ND CROSS, NEAR BASAVESHWARA TEMPLE, NEAR KENDRIYA GRANTHALAYA, BENGALURU - 560 097. ALSO R/AT SRI. SIDDARAJU, M S/O MAHADEVAPPA, YADAMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, UYAMBALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHIKSHIT U., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SHILPA N AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, W/O SIDDARJU. M 2. KUM. PUNYASHREE AGEDA BOUT 5 YEARS D/O SIDDARAJU M., BOTH R/O NO.594, HINKAL BEEDHI, HOSA BEEDHI, KASABA HOBLI, MYSURU, MYSURU TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:26.07.2024 IN THE COURT OF 1ST ADDNL PRL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU IN CRL.MISC.NO. 512/2022 Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13976 WP No. 6655 of 2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-E, BY WAY OF ISSUE OF CERTIORARI. ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO RESPONDENT WIFE TO SUBMIT THE MULTIPLE BANK ACCOUNTS AND PAN CARDS HELD BY HER AND REFER THE CASE FOR MEDIATION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER The present petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the final order passed in Crl.Misc.512/2022 dated 26.07.2024. Proceedings were initiated by the respondent's wife and minor child under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, the present petition filed invoking the writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. The petitioner may have to file revision petition challenging the said order as contemplated in law. Hence, the objection raised by the Registry regarding maintainability is sustained, This petition is dismissed as not maintainable. However liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings challenging the said order under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13976 WP No. 6655 of 2025 Liberty is reserved to file appropriate petition. Time spent before this court shall be condoned. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE SRK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10 CT:SK