RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SMT ANIMA DAS and 6 ORS
MACApp./40/2017 · 2025-08-17
Budi Habung
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18332 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18332 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010192512017
2025:GAU-AS:10891
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MACApp./40/2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 570 NAIGUM CROSS ROAD, NEX TO ROYAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, WADALA W, MUMBAI-400031 AND BRANCH- 1 OFFICE AT 5TH FLOOR, ANIL PLAZA, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI 781005, REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER VERSUS SMT ANIMA DAS and 6 ORS W/O LATE UMAKANTA DAS 2:BULU DAS S/O LATE UMAKANTA DAS 3:MISS DIPANALI DAS D/O LATE UMAKANTA DAS 4:PRAKASH DAS S/O LATE UMAKANTA DAS 5:SMTI NADUKI DAS MOTHER OF LT. UMAKANTA DAS ALL ARE R/O VILL. TIPLING NAGAON P.S. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3 6:MD. ABDUL AZIZ S/O SAMSER ALI VILL. A.T. ROAD ADABARI P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM.
7:MD. MANSUR ANSHARI S/O MD. H. ANSHARI VILL. AHUCHOWLGAON P.S. LAKHIMPUR AHU CHAULKHUWA DIST. UTTAR LAKHIMPU Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.C SHARMA, MS. M SAIKIA,MS. P BORTHAKUR,MR.SIDHANT DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : MR.D SAIKIASr. Adv., MR. K K DUTTA,MR.U BARUAH
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER 18.08.2025 This matter is listed for referral to the Special Mediation Drive-Mediation ‘For the Nation’. No one appeared on behalf of either party when the matter was called. On perusal of the record, it appears that the appellant has not taken steps upon respondent Nos. 6 and 7 pursuant to the order dated 06.08.2019. Although a final opportunity was given to the appellant on 04.11.2022 to take steps against the said respondents. The appellant has failed to take necessary steps despite several opportunities. Thus, the Court finds no ground to keep the appeal pending any further, as it was filed in 2017 and has remained pending for the past nine years. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant