HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1745 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No. 185 of 2025, under Sections 108, 61 (2) BNS, 2023, PS Kotwali Rudauli, District Ayodhya. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that son of informant was in affair with one co accused Akansha Singh and had married in the year 2022. Subsequently their relation soured and the daughter in law fell in love with the applicant because of which the son of informant consumed poison and committed suicide. In the light of the said allegations the applicant is sought to be prosecuted for offence in question under Section 108 BNS and he apprehends his arrest. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the nature of allegations and there being no material to suggest abetment at the instance of the applicant as defined in the BNS, the applicant is entitled for benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant- Saheb Singh alias Pratap Bahadur Singh be released on anticipatory bail in the above said first information report number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Mishra, Prashant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saheb Singh @ Pratap Bahadur Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 20, 2025 mks NABAIL No. 1745 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench