[2025:RJ-JP:22707] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7255/2025 1. Mahaveer Prasad Yadav S/o Shri Prathvi Raj Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 15, Dhani Dhundhla Ki, Bhabroo, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Raghav Arora S/o Shri Rajneesh Arora, Aged About 23 Years, R/o A-400, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan , Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. The Principal And Controller, Sawai Mansingh Medical College And Hospital, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. The Medical Superintendent, Super Specialty Hospital (Pmssy), Sawai Mansingh Medical College, Jaipur (Raj.) 6. The Supervisor (Pharmacist), Super Specialty Hospital (Pmssy), Sawai Mansingh Medical College, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 30/05/2025 On 12.05.2025, this Court passed the following order:- “This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent not to replace the petitioners with another set of contractual employees. [2025:RJ-JP:22707] (2 of 2) [CW-7255/2025] Indisputably, the petitioners are working through placement agency with no privity of contract with the official respondents. In view thereof, this Court is not prima facie satisfied that the petitioners are entitled for the relief prayed for. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted time to complete her instructions. List the matter on 15.05.2025 at top of the list as prayed.” Today, none appears for the petitioners even in second round. This Court has, in the case of Ram Khilari and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14835/2021, held that the persons appointed through placement agency cannot seek a writ of mandamus against the official respondents to continue them in service as there is no privity of contract in between them. In view of the aforesaid judgement, this writ petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/14