CWP-2283-2023 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (213) CWP-2283-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : March 21, 2025 Amiteshwar Singh Sidhu .. Petitioner Versus Panjab University, Chandigarh and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Indresh Goel, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Shailesh Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.4. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that all the disputes between the petitioner and the University have been resolved except that now, the University is of the view that the petitioner has not appeared in the examination of Criminal Procedure (P4) of the 5th Semester which was held at the time of Covid-19 in May 2021. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is incorrect that the petitioner did not appear in the said examination but rather, the petitioner has not only appeared in the said examination which was conducted on 06.03.2021 but also has submitted the said paper to the examination branch as per the Rules as well as to the College also and there seems to be a discrepancy hence, the petitioner be given liberty to approach HARSHA RANI 2025.03.25 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-2283-2023 (O&M) 2 the respondent-University to re-verify the fact of the petitioner not appearing in the examination of Criminal Procedure (P4). 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that in case any such representation/claim is received along with material concerned at the hands of the petitioner, the same will be taken into consideration and appropriate order will be passed with regard to the grievance of the petitioner that he has already appeared in the examination of Criminal Procedure (P4) on 06.03.2021 and in case, it is found that assertion of the petitioner is correct, appropriate relief admissible will be granted to the petitioner otherwise due reasons will be mentioned while passing the speaking order, which reasons will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondent-University, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation with the respondents. 5. Ordered accordingly. 6. Any civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands disposed of. March 21, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.03.25 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document