Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183275 (ALL)

GOPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/9203/2025 · 2025-10-31

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9203 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Anshuman Pandey, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No. 239/ 2018 (State vs. Tribhuvan Singh and others) pending before the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar arising out of Case Crime No.35/1996 u/s 323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C. & u/s 3(i)(x) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Bhiti, District- Ambedkar Nagar on the basis of the Compromise dated 09.10.2025 entered between the Applicants and the Opposite Party No.2." 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.6 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saryu Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prince Kumar Pandey Gopal Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. October 31, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 9203 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench