C/M WAQF DARGAH HAZRAT MOHAMMAD MASTAN MIYAN THRU. SECY. SRI HAQEEQ KHAN AND ANOTHER v. U.P. SUNNI CENTRAL WAQF BOARD LKO. THRU. ITS CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER
/11756/2025 · 2025-12-09
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183271 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183271 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11756 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 10.11.2025 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.1 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 1/Chairman, U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Syed Aftab Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : Farhan Habib C/M Waqf Dargah Hazrat Mohammad Mastan Miyan Thru. Secy. Sri Haqeeq Khan And Another .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And Another .....Respondent(s)
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 9, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 11756 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench