HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11496 of 2025 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Suresh Chand Rathour, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Dilip Kr. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.5 and Sri Mohd. Kasim, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The instant petition has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 27.6.2025 passed in case no. 3486 of 2025 (computerized case No. T202510330103486) under Section 24 of the U.,P. Revenue Code. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.5 have raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has a statutory remedy to file an appeal under Section 24(4) U.P. Revenue Code to file an appeal. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this case with liberty to file appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. 6. In case such an appeal is filed by the petitioner under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code within a period of 15 days, then the same shall be decided expeditiously within six months. December 2, 2025 Vandana Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Chand Rathour Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Mahadev .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench