NOOR ALAM @ NURUL NISHA AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/9072/2024 · 2025-11-19
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9072 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for private opposite party no.4.
2. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 19.11.2025 received from Shri Mukesh Kumar, Sub-Inspector, Police Station- Safadarganj, District- Barabanki, submits that charge-sheet no.414/2024 dated 05.11.2024 has been filed in the Court of A.C.J.M., Court No.19, Barabanki on 07.07.2025, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy. However, Ms. Manjusha Kapil, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy as may be available under law, if already not availed, to which there is no objection by learned A.G.A. as well as by learned counsel for private opposite party no.4. The instructions are taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. November 19, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manjusha Kapil Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rinku Verma (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Noor Alam @ Nurul Nisha And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench