AMAR NATH GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STAMP AND REGISTRATION DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/12794/2025 · 2025-11-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183242 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183242 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12794 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. (1) Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. (2) Petition has been filed seeking following relief:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to allow the petitioner the benefits of notional increment due with effect from 01.07.2012 in terms of the government order no 11/2024/SA-3-227/10-19099/4/2024 dated 12.06.2024 as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition and accordingly to allow him the revised pensionary benefits, within a short reasonable period to be prescribed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Stamp & Registration Department, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 4, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : I.M. Pandey Ist, Dev Prakash Tyagi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Amar Nath Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Stamp And Registration Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench