Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183226 (ALL)

STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. v. JAGDISH DIXIT

A378D/26/2025 · 2025-11-03

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 378 DEFECTIVE No. - 26 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Shri Vivek Gupta, learned A.G.A.-I states inadvertently the appeal has been filed against the judgment of first appellate court though revision should have been filed. Accordingly, the application seeking condonation of delay as also the appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C. in issue both be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the appellant to file the revision along with application seeking condonation of delay. Taking note of the aforesaid, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for. Office is directed to return certified copy of the papers/judgment annexed with the application to the learned counsel for the appellant, as per rules. November 3, 2025 ML/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : G.A. Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sanjay Pandey, Harshita Mishra (Saurabh Lavania,J.) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Applicant(s) Jagdish Dixit .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench