CHETNA MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, GOVT. OF U.P. LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
CRLP/333/2024 · 2025-11-21
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 333 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 01.03.2024. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 21, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.Z. Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Chetna Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Govt. Of U.P. Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench