Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183221 (ALL)

RAHUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO

BAIL/555/2025 · 2025-11-12

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 555 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 193 of 2024, under sections 64(1), 137(2), 87 BNS, P.S. Malikpur, District Ambedkarnagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughters of the informant aged about 18 and 15 years were missing and were enticed by some unknown person. Subsequently in the statement under Section 180 BNSS victim stated her age as 18 year and stated that as she was scolded she left her home and went to Delhi. The second daughter also disclosed her age as 17 and ½ years and submitted that both of them went to Ludhiyana. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 30.8.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rahul be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Gauri Shankar Maurya, Rajeev Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 12, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 555 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench