Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010253672024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 12670 OF 2024 Between; S. S. Krishna Murthy, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged 38 Years, Occ; Service, R/o. 5-64/85/1/19, Brodipet, Guntur, Gutur District. ...Petitioner AND
1. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.
2. Reserve Bank of India, Rep. by its Regional Director, Fort Glacis, No. 16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.
3. Canara Bank, Rep. by its Managing Director, Regd. Office-112, J. C. Road, Bangalore, Karnataka.
4. Can Fin Homes Ltd, (Sponsor- Canara Bank) Rep. by its Managing Director, Regd. Off- 29/1, Sri M. N. Krishna Rao Raod Basavangudi Bangalore - 560 004.
5. Sri Sarathchandran V, Chief Manager, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Regional Office, Bangalore.
6. Sri Prathap K, Manager, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Bangalore. Regional Office ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a writ,
order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inquiry proceedings being conducted by the 5'*^ Respondent in the matter of Charge Sheet under Ref. NoCFH-DP- STF-692- CH 16/23-24 Dt-11.03.2024 issued by 4‘^ Respondent and Article of r Charges annexed thereto, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, biased, malicious. Justice settled principles of service violative of principles of Natural jurisprudence and violative of the provisions of Can Fin Homes (Staff) Service Regulations, 1988 and offends Articles 14, and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently Quash all said proceedings including Articles of Charges framed against the petitioner or alternatively terminate the appointment of 5^^ Respondent as inquiry Officer and direct the 4‘^ Respondent to appoint an alternative external prudent personal as an inquiry officer to conduct the proceedings in unbiased, fair and transparent manner. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in the matter of inquiry being Respondent in the matter of Charge Sheet under Ref. No; conducted by 5 CFH:DP:STF:692: CH: 16/23-24 Dt: 11.03.2024 issued by 4‘^ Respondent and Article of Charges annexed thereto, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Between;
1. Can Fin Homes Ltd, (Sponsor- Canara Bank) Rep. by its Managing Director, Regd. Off- 29/1, Sri M. N. Krishna Rao Raod Basavangudi Bangalore - 560 004. 2. Sri Sarathchandran V, Chief Manager, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Regional Office, Bangalore. Regional Office,
3. Sri Prathap K, Manager, Can Fin Homes Ltd. Bangalore. ...Petitioners/Respondents 4 to 6 AND
1. S. S. Krishna Murthy, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged 38 Years, Occ: Service, R/o. 5-64/85/1/19, Brodipet, Guntur, Gutur District. 2. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. Reserve Bank of India, Rep. by its Regional Director, Fort Glacis, No. 16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. 4. Canara Bank, Rep. by its Managing Director, Regd. Office-112, J. C. Road, Bangalore, Karnataka. ...Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 25.06.2024 in W.P. No. 12670 of 2024 and dismiss the WP.
lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive Reply Affidavit on record by allowing the Leave Petition in the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATA MOHAN RAO PATHAKOTA, Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : SRI P. PONNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI SREEDHAR VALIVETI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : SRI BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following :
APHC010253672024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 12670 OF 2024 Between: 1.S.S.KRISHNA MURTHY, S. S. KRISHNA MURTHY S/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED 38 YEARS, OCC- SEIVICE, R/0 5- 64/85/1/19, BRODIPET, GUNTUR, GUTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI. 2.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR, FORT GLACIS, NO. 16, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 001 3.CANARA BANK, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE-112, J. C. ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA. 4.CAN FIN HOMES LTD, (SPONSOR- CANARA BANK) REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REGD. OFF- 29/1, SRI M. N. KRISHNA RAO RAOD BASAVANGUDI BANGALORE - 560 004 5.SRI SARATHCHANDRAN V, CHIEF MANAGER, CAN FIN HOMES LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, BANGALORE. 6.SRI PRATHAP K, MANAGER, CAN FIN HOMES LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, BANGALORE. REGD. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATA MOHAN RAO PATHAKOTA 2.KOYI SOWMYA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.BALAJI MEDAMALLI 2.GP FOR SERVICES I 3.SREEDHAR VALIVETI The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 12670 OF 2024
ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the inquiry proceedings being conducted by the Respondent No.5 in the matter of Charge Sheet under Reference No.CFH: DP; STF:692; CH:16/23-24, dated 11.03.2024 issued by the Respondent No.4 and Articles of Charges framed therein as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The Petitioner is an employee of Can Fin Homes Limited. While he was working as Manager at Vijayawada Branch, the Respondent No.4 was issued a Charge Memo dated 11.03.2024 under Regulation 76, under Chapter XI (Discipline and Appeal) of Can Fin Homes Staff Service Regulations (Amendment), 2018 against the Petitioner and placed him under suspension from 21.10.2023. Questioning the same, the Petitioner sought for certain documents to deny his case with regard to Articles of Charges framed against him. As the same was not being furnished, the present Writ Petition came to be filed.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the answering Respondent No.4 would submit that the Writ Petition is not maintainable as the Respondent No.4 cannot be termed to be a State of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
Learned counsel further relied upon a Judgment of this Court with reference to
Respondent No.4 in “P.S.Sudhir V. Canfin Homes Ltd., Bangalore and Others
4. Having heard the respective counsel, this Court in P.S.Sudhir’s case cited supra had considered the issue whether Writ Petition can be maintained against the Respondent No.4 and taking note of the constitutional bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Pradeep Kumar Biswas Institute of Chemical Biology"^ it was held that the Respondent No.4 i: neither a State nor an instrumentality of the State. The Petitioner’s service grievance therein cannot be pursuant under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. V. Indian Indian IS
5. Since, this issue pertains to Can Fin Homes Limited, this Court being governed by the Judgments cited supra, have no option to dismiss the Writ Petition for want of maintainability. The Petitioner is at liberty to pursue his remedies before appropriate fora, having jurisdiction.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ^ 2012 SCu OnLine AP 809 ^2002) seem SRINIVASA RAO ASSISTANT registrar //TRUE COPY// SEeTION OFFieER To,
1. The Secretary to Government Finance, New Delhi. of India, Union of India, Ministry of
2. The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, No. 16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001
3. The Managing Director, Canara Bank, Regd. Office-112, J. C. Road, Bangalore, Karnataka.
4. The Managing Director, Can Fin Homes Ltd, (Sponsor- Canara Bank) Regd. Off- 29/1, Sri M. N. Krishna Rao Raod Basavangudi Bangalore - 560 004
5. Sri Sarathchandran V, Chief Manager, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Regional Office, Bangalore.
6. Sri Prathap K, Manager, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Bangalore.
7. One CC to Sri Venkata Mohan Rao Pathakota, Advocate [OPUC]
8. One CC to Sri P. Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor General of India (OPUC)
9. One CC to Sri Balaji Medamalli, Advocate [OPUC] 10.Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 11 .One CC to Sri Sreedhar Valiveti, Advocate [OPUC] 12.TWO CD Copies Regional Office, Cnr
HIGH COURT DATED: 16/09/2025
ORDER WP NO. 12670 OF 2024 *( 2 3 SEP 2025 )% ^^N^jrrentSectiOij.-- i,y DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS