MUZIB AHAMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/9834/2025 · 2025-10-30
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183219 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183219 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9834 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard Sri Sanjeev Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, the notice to opposite party No.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 specially to the police of the Police Station-Asoha, District-Unnao not to harass the petitioner and his family members in the garb of inquiry/ investigation. (b) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite party No.3 to conclude the investigation within stipulated time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper."
4. At the very outset, Sri S.P. Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate has informed on the basis of instructions that during course of investigation, Section 376 I.P.C. has been added on the basis of statement of the prosecutrix, therefore, the petitioner will have to surrender before the Competent Court and to have file bail application. 5. On that, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that liberty may be given to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the Competent Court and direction may be issued to hear and decide the same Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Shukla, Raj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Muzib Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
with expedition. 6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid innocuous request of learned counsel for the petitioner, we hereby dispose of this writ petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law within a period of two weeks from today and if such anticipatory bail application is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merit, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition without giving any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. 7.
7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. October30,2025 Suresh/ CRLP No. 9834 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench