HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3111 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned counsel for State. 2. Learned counsel for applicant has fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Notice, if any, stands discharged. October 31, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shambhoo Sharan Lal Srivastava, Ashish Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Jogendra Nath Verma (Manish Kumar,J.) Dinesh Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) Dr. Hiralal Chairman And Administrator, Greater Sharda Sahayak Command Project, Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench