1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1171 of 2025 Decided on: 09.03.2026. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Puran Singh …..Petitioner Versus Ms. M Sudha Devi and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Tamanna Rana, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Respondents are stated to have filed the compliance affidavit. A copy thereof was made available for perusal. 2. In terms of the compliance affidavit, respondents had considered & decided the case of the petitioner under office order dated 11.02.2026 passed by Director, School Education, Shimla, H.P. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of passing of consideration order, present proceedings be closed, however, liberty be reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate liberty for redressal of his surviving grievances including against the consideration order. 3. Taking note of the compliance affidavit filed by the respondents as also the submission made by learned 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 counsel for the petitioner, present proceedings are closed. Notice issued to respondents are discharged. Petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 09, 2026 Judge yogesh