APHC010119962026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6679 OF Between: 1. K SIVA GOPI, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O RUPENAGUNTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, NAKARIKALLU MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidav pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.9/Disciplinary/FA-HR, dt. 14.11.2025 issued by the 2 respondent thereby suspended the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant working in Rupenagunta Gram Panchayat of Nakarikallu Mandal in Palnadu District (Erstwhile Guntur District), natural justice, contrary Guarantee Scheme Act. 2005 and offends Articles 14 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the proceedings d the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into se pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6679 OF 2026 K SIVA GOPI, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O RUPENAGUNTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, NAKARIKALLU MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned proceedings in HR, dt. 14.11.2025 issued by the 2 respondent reby suspended the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant working in Rupenagunta Gram Panchayat of Nakarikallu Mandal in Palnadu District (Erstwhile Guntur District), is illegal, arbitrary. It is violative of principles of to the provisions of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Act. 2005 and offends Articles 14 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the proceedings dt. 14.11.2025 and direct respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service for the said post and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA K SIVA GOPI, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O RUPENAGUNTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, NAKARIKALLU MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE ...PETITIONER REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the it filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned proceedings in HR, dt. 14.11.2025 issued by the 2 respondent reby suspended the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant working in Rupenagunta Gram Panchayat of Nakarikallu Mandal in Palnadu District violative of principles of to the provisions of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Act. 2005 and offends Articles 14 21 of Constitution of t. 14.11.2025 and direct rvice for the said post and IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Rc.No.9/Disciplinary/FA-HRdt. 14.11.2025 issued by the 2ND respondent and consequently direct the 2ND respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service in the post of Field Assistant working in Rupenagunta Gram Panchayat of Nakarikallu Mandal in Palnadu District (Erstwhile Guntur District), pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’bie Court fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6679 OF 2026 ORDER:- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that no further cause survives in this Writ Petition and became infructuous. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.05.2026 KK