RAM NATH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/13345/2025 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13345 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arun Pratap Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Nischay Singh,
learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents particularly the respondent no. 1 and 2 to reckon the long period of work-charged/daily wages service rendered by petitioner since 1985 till 19.12.2006 for purposes of computation of 'qualifying service' for grant of pension as this Hon'ble Court had already directed the respondents repeatedly for considering the claim of petitioner for regularization; After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Aydoya, District- Ayodhya and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to the
contentions aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Shankar, Mahendra Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Singh Ram Nath Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/ Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Aydoya, District-Ayodhya within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. November 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13345 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench