HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11274 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for respondents no.1 to 3. 2. No notice be issued to respondent no.4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 0422 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 333, 351(3), 352 and 324(4) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Mohanlalganj , District Lucknow. 4. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 29.11.2025 sent by Sri Saurabh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow, states that a charge sheet has been submitted before the supervisory authority. 5. Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out. 6. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Matri Datt Tripathi, Sartaj Ahmed Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Lala Manihar @ Mukhtar Ahamad And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioners in the writ petition no case on merits is made out. 8. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him. 9. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 1, 2025 A. Katiyar CRLP No. 11274 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench