Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183167 (ALL)

DEENANATH PATHAK AND 29 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.RURAL DEPTT.CIVIL SECTT.LKO. and ORS.

WRIA/11497/2017 · 2025-11-25

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11497 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 25, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripat, Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Deenanath Pathak And 29 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Rural Deptt.Civil Sectt.Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench