CRL OP No. 24675 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP No. 24675 of 2025 T.Johnvictor Petitioner(s) Vs The State by the Inspector of Police EOW Police Station, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.2 of 2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 2 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police Station. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Hemalatha For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 316, 316(4), 336, 340, 344 of BNS, in Crime No.2 of 2025 seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24675 of 2025 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons of the Thiruvannamalai District Central Cooperative Bank, Gandhi Nagar East Branch i.e, its member were pledged furious jewels committed misappropriation on which the petitioner's name also included as an Accused No.22 and he was alleged that he pledged furious jewels to the tune of Rs.18 lakhs. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he sought for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner along with other accused persons of the Thiruvannamalai District Central Cooperative Bank, Gandhi Nagar East Branc i.e, its member were pledged furious jewels committed misappropriation on which the petitioner's name also included as an Accused No.22 and he was alleged that he pledged furious jewels to the tune of Rs.18 lakhs. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24675 of 2025 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of offence and the stage of investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 12-09-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24675 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police EOW Police Station, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24675 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. gbi CRL OP No. 24675 of 2025 12-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis