Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18315 (JHR)

JHALBAL JHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4371/2025 · 2025-08-28

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25825 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4371 of 2025 ----- Jhalbal Jha, S/o Megh Nath Jha, R/o H. No.84/ Prasidh Niwas, Shital Mallik Road, Bilasi Town, Deoghar, P.O. Deghar, P.S. Deoghar (T), District Deoghar, State Jharkhand ------ Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand 3.The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand 4.The Deputy Commissioner cum Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Dumka, P.O., P.S. & District Dumka 5.The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka, P.O., P.S. & District Dumka ------ Respondent(s) …… CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruchi Mukti, AC to AAG-IA …...... 04 / 28.08.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs: 1. for direction upon the respondent authorities, particularly respondent no.3, to immediately and forthwith consider the candidature of petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher (1to 5) Non Para Unreserved category at the district of Dumka in view of the fact that candidates having lesser marks than petitioner have been given appointment in the same category. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that suffice it would be if the representation of the petitioner be directed to be disposed of by respondent No.5- The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka, P.O., P.S. & District Dumka. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that if the petitioner files a detailed representation before the respondent No.5- The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka, P.O., P.S. & District Dumka, his case will be considered. 5. Considering the submission of the parties, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.5- The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka, P.O., P.S. & District Dumka who will consider the case of the petitioner. 6. The representation should be filed within four weeks and the decision should be taken within six weeks thereafter. 7. If it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any benefits the same should be extended to the petitioner. If the claim of the petitioner is rejected for any reasons whatsoever the reasons should be communicated to the petitioner within a period of four weeks thereafter. 8. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S.